Filtering by Tag: CENSORSHIP

Fuck in the New York Times

Recently, the New York Times published the word "fuck." Here, the paper's public editor, Margaret Sullivan, explains why.

"Some readers have questioned the use of vulgarity in the series, including two instances of 'the f-word' in Thursday’s installment, the most notable of which is in a quotation from Dasani’s mother as she addresses her directly. It’s highly unusual for The Times.

The associate managing editor for standards, Philip B. Corbett, explained:

'We had a very thorough discussion of the use of the vulgarities in that passage, which are certainly not the norm for us. The writer and editors avoided language like that in other places. But they made a strong argument that the full quotations were important in this very crucial scene. In the end, we decided that for readers, more would be lost than gained if we tried to write around those passages here. And we concluded that using that language in this one spot — but not repeatedly scattered throughout the articles — would not be likely to distract or offend many readers. Our basic guidelines about avoiding vulgarities and obscenities haven’t changed, but we all recognize that there are cases where an exception is justified.'"

The quotes in question:

  1. "'Shut the fuck up,' she says. 'You know, that’s one thing I don’t like about you — your negativity. You always talkin’ about the problem. You got a solution?'"
  2. "She think she some-fucking-body."

[NYT / Related: "Satan Is Offended"]

YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG: MOTHER JONES

The Accused: Asawin Suebsaeng for Mother Jones

The Problem: This well-respected publication and its DC reporter are going to have to do better if they want to improve their online sex game.

The Story: "The Evan Rachel Wood Oral Sex Scene the MPAA Doesn't Want You to See."

The Money Shot: A paragraph from the "Charlie Countryman" script describing a cunnilingus sex scene starring Evan Rachel Wood and Shia LaBeouf that was shot but cut from the final version so the movie would receive an R rating instead of NC-17 rating, an incident Wood bitched about on Twitter by claiming the MPAA had "censor[ed] a woman's sexuality once again."

The Fail: The title of the article promised sex, but clickers found no sex, just words, which are not sex.

The Grade: D-

The Takeaway: When it comes to digital content, don't promise to fuck and not put out.